I vote for the RB and the Spessartites.

We need some stones with REAL color; get this place hopping!
Trinkette, start the trend!

This must be the reason I like them so much. Pass me a meatball!!

OMC, I totally see your point about the too-large aspect of the spess with the RB.  If I had a tad smaller spess pair, I might try it.  However, like my Glarkler ring, I'm going for a three-stone "big band" look" and I'm hoping the scintillation and brilliance of the center stone will carry it off.  The RB really is quite spectacular, so, I THINK that I'll be OK.  If we get to a point where David or a setter says no-go, too awkward, then, I can swap-out the stones, or have the spess recut. I do not want this ring to look completely "normal," so I'm willing to go out on a limb a little here. Meanwhile, I'll give it a bit more thought. Thank you.

Also, I like your OB cushion suggestions.  Generally, I like three-stone rings with maximum East-West finger coverage (as little shank showing as possible). And, when I can do it, I prefer larger-than-average sides that are shaped differently from the center... fat half-moons or traps might just fit the bill perfectly.

BTW, I guessed your preferences in correct order! Now that I've had some time to think about them all, I must admit, the K cushion pops up in my mind most frequently.  It really is exquisitely beautiful. 

These stones are fun because each really DOES have it's own personality.

Any other thoughts?  Anyone?

T-I forgot to ask if you had the sides or if D sourced them for you?  Lovely either way!

T-you need to show us more pics of your 'pile' of gems

I love three stone rings. And I'd have had another if I didn't already have one on my other hand. So my vote is the cushion with the pinks. But I'd want the center to be N/S.

It's a great collection.