|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
clgwli
Administrator
Hero Member
    
Offline
Posts: 3194

|
 |
« Reply #19 on: November 16, 2011, 11:53:08 AM » |
|
You could honestly do whatever you want with a ring like this. I think with a substantial shank like this, it would be wise to go with a wider band as well (as long as your finger could take it). I see all kinds of options with this ring. 1) Simple band same width/thickness 2) Channel set of similar width/thickness 3) Scatter band of similar size with whatever you like 4) Floral etched band that will tie in the wonderful head of the ring 5) Shared prong diamond band 6) a bunch of stackers that could be anything you want  Yeah the last one is totally not helpful. But really that was the order of a band I would look into if it were me. In my eyes the focus is going to be on that ring due to the lovely size of it. I would let the engagement ring be the focus with a more simple band to go with it. I think a channel set would fit better with feel given how classic and fluid this ring looks. I would actually prefer more metal in the band than diamonds if it were mine. Really you can't go wrong though. Have you gotten the ring back yet? I'd love to see it on your hand as well 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|