win diamond earringsfancy colored diamonds colored diamondsfancy colored diamonds yellow diamond jewelryfancy colored diamonds loose pink diamondsfancy colored diamonds engagement rings fancy colored diamonds fancy colored diamonds fancy colored diamonds loose diamonds fancy colored diamonds diamond movies
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 19, 2012, 01:08:31 AM
Home Help Search Calendar recent diamond posts recent posts unread posts Login Register

News: DBL  opens brand new colored diamond website!  Now, you can search through millions of dollars of incredible Natural Fancy  Colored and Colorless diamonds with facilities found nowhere else! Search diamond  rings, and loose  diamonds by color, Intensity of yellow, carat weight, price, and diamond  shape. SEE FORUM RULES and our PRIVACY POLICY. DiamondsbyLauren photobucket  page . DiamondsbyLauren Youtube  Channel
 
 
Our Toll Free Number 1-877-952-8736. International callers 001-212-382-3770.

+  coloreddiamond.info
|-+  ABOUT DIAMONDS BY LAUREN
| |-+  Ask about the Rings or Diamonds we offer
| | |-+  Which DBL halo ring?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 14 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Which DBL halo ring?  (Read 25457 times)
DiamondHunter
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 220



« on: February 04, 2009, 03:30:19 AM »

#R2837
0.42ct K/SI2 Cushion in Platinum

or
 
#R2838
0.50ct J/SI2 Cushion in White Gold

Both fits my budget, have the same setting but are set in different metal. Which one would you recommend?   
Logged

If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is definitely not for you...
Mrs Mitchell
Member Moderator
Hero Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7563


« Reply #1 on: February 04, 2009, 05:03:47 AM »


Oh, these are both beautiful rings.

Personally, I'd go for platinum. I'm too hard on rings for white gold to stay white for long and re-plating can get expensive over time. Some people get on better with white gold than others, though. My skin seems to turn it yellow really quickly, but I have friends who have worn white gold rings for years and never had to have them rhodium dipped. I think of platinum as being more robust for a ring and you can have it polished over and over without losing any of the metal.

Plus, I like the cut of the cushion in the platinum setting best, and it looks like it 'fills out' the halo. I love that ring actually.

Is this a ring for yourself, or is it for an engagement ring? If it's an e-ring, it might be worth thinking if you would like a white gold or platinum wedding band to wear with it.

Hope that's helpful!

Jen
Logged

Customer Service Associate
jennifer@diamondsbylauren.com
Awestruck
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1974



« Reply #2 on: February 04, 2009, 12:28:44 PM »

Hi Hunter
Both of the white metals look lovely but for durability I`d go for the platinum, especially if the ring`s to be worn on a daily basis.
I`m sure whichever one you choose will be lovely.
Lynne
Logged

Diamonds are like people, put them under a microscope and you`ll always see a flaw but hold them up to the Sun and each and every one is beautiful.
webmistress
Admin
CDI Member
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4561



WWW
« Reply #3 on: February 04, 2009, 01:30:56 PM »



Item #R2838

.42ct split shank cushion cut halo in platinum



Item #R2837

.50ct split shank cushion cut halo in white gold

I'd go with the platinum ring. Split shank halo rings are so classic. What a lovely choice. I posted the above so everyone could see the choices and link to the listings to give the best feedback.

Logged

Webmistress for http://diamondsbylauren.com
DBL Web Designer, CDI Administrator

  Dare to be different. See colored diamond rings.
Diamondsbylauren
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8063



WWW
« Reply #4 on: February 04, 2009, 02:29:09 PM »

Hello everyone!
Thanks for the amazing replies so far!

In terms of the metal, Lynne, and Jen are indeed correct that platinuym is the finest metal for a ring.
We've had amazing results with white gold as well- meaing personally, I would also consider a white gold ring, if that's what you decide upon.

Jen- you did mention something about platinum which I wanted to address- when platinum is polished you do indeed loose a little every time.
The poliush wheel is abrasive and actually grinds away some of the metal as it shines it!


Diamondhunter- to assist you in choosing, I took a photo of both rings together ( on my ulta "beefy" finger)


The .50 is on the right, the .42 on the left.....the rings are very close in appearance......

Hope this helps!!
Logged

David
Check out our YouTube Channel
Mrs Mitchell
Member Moderator
Hero Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7563


« Reply #5 on: February 04, 2009, 03:09:03 PM »

Ah. I didn't know that about platinum. Thanks David. I should maybe be a little bit less enthusiastic about having my rings polished.

DiamondHunter, these rings are just to die for. Gorgeous. Which one are you leaning towards?

Jen
Logged

Customer Service Associate
jennifer@diamondsbylauren.com
Diamondsbylauren
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8063



WWW
« Reply #6 on: February 04, 2009, 03:50:07 PM »

You'd really need to polish the jewelry many times to start seeing any durability issues-  but the fact is that every time the ring touches the polish wheel, there's a little metal left behind
Logged

David
Check out our YouTube Channel
Mrs Mitchell
Member Moderator
Hero Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7563


« Reply #7 on: February 04, 2009, 04:50:35 PM »

Hmm. I pop in and get them done whenever I go into the City. That's a lot of polishing, now I think about it. If they disappear, I won't be able to say you didn't warn me! Grin
Logged

Customer Service Associate
jennifer@diamondsbylauren.com
webmistress
Admin
CDI Member
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4561



WWW
« Reply #8 on: February 04, 2009, 04:55:03 PM »

They are close in appearance. DiamondHunter, just call David. I think my preference would still be the platinum one but I'm not sure in person I'd be able to tell the difference.
Logged

Webmistress for http://diamondsbylauren.com
DBL Web Designer, CDI Administrator

  Dare to be different. See colored diamond rings.
cherrypie
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 467


« Reply #9 on: February 05, 2009, 01:46:40 AM »

I love that .42 in the platinum, if I had the money I'd have snapped it up myself.

Carol   Cool
Logged
ah2bqat
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3056



« Reply #10 on: February 05, 2009, 02:27:59 AM »

Cherry pie - that's the one I wanted , but I'm waiting  on the refinacnce of the TX house!
Logged

Auntie Dammit Heart DBL!
GIAGirl
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4037



« Reply #11 on: February 05, 2009, 02:48:05 AM »

I love that .42 in the platinum, if I had the money I'd have snapped it up myself.

Carol   Cool

I second this vote. 
Logged

GracefulLion
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3941



« Reply #12 on: February 05, 2009, 12:50:41 PM »

Tough call!  They are virutally indistinguishable.  I think I like the .42 center slightly better, but the platinum is compelling.  Either one will be a fabulous find!
Logged
DiamondHunter
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 220



« Reply #13 on: February 05, 2009, 01:18:18 PM »

Wow. What can I say? The responses from everyone have been nothing but helpful! I'm among diamond lovers! And I really appreciate David's initiative of putting up the 2 rings on a finger for easier comparison.

These 2 stones certainly punch above their carat weight. While I do detect a hint of color on the 0.42, it somehow adds to the character. Any chance of having them YouTubed? Smiley  

Jen, I am leaning towards the more durable platinum as it is for an engagement. My only concern now is whether the yellowish tint is really noticeable since she has expressed her preference for 'colorless-looking' diamonds. I do have a sharper eye for colors but when it comes to E-rings, you know how women can grow to be such perfectionists.  

What do you think of the cut? Symmetry and polish? In the side-by-side comparison, the 2 stones appear rather glass-like and I could see David's skin color right through them. Is this attributable to the stones' rather shallow 2mm depth which might lead to too much light leaking out through the pavilion? Or would a floating halo improve it's 'on-finger' appearance?  

And speaking of floating halos, I noticed a stunner in #R2839 with a center cushion with exact stats as that of R2837. Am I seeing double here?

I'm sorry if I ask too many questions. I just wish I could examine them up close and personal.   Undecided      
Logged

If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is definitely not for you...
ah2bqat
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3056



« Reply #14 on: February 05, 2009, 01:38:13 PM »

 david

I think diamondhunter found a web booboo.  2839 and 2837 both open to the Daussi floating halo from the search bar. Plus, on top it shows 2839 and talks about a .45 ct stone, but the GIA stats show a .42 stone at the bottom along with the 2837 moniker.   icon_scratch
Logged

Auntie Dammit Heart DBL!
Diamondsbylauren
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8063



WWW
« Reply #15 on: February 05, 2009, 05:13:27 PM »

Thank you ah2bqat!

The wee boo boo is fixed!

Diamond Hunter: Theses two diamonds do not have GIA reports- but I can see no problems at all concerning Polish or Symmetry.  Daussi cushions oft times are on the shallow side- which sometimes allows a bit of "windowing" but when the rings are worn, you won't really notice the skin underneath.
I agree- a video is called for!

Hopefully I can have one or two up tomorrow!
Logged

David
Check out our YouTube Channel
DiamondHunter
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 220



« Reply #16 on: February 06, 2009, 12:03:00 AM »

Oh ok that explains it. Will wait for the video then. I'm all excited.  Grin

I don't doubt the ring's excellent value since the platinum setting alone is probably worth the ring price. I had my eye on the loose 0.50ct E/SI cushion #R2561 earlier. It would make an awesome center but I doubt if I could get it set on a paved halo and still keep the total cost under $2500. Would it work with the diamond-studded antique style mount in platinum?

Decisions, decisions.. A Libra can be so indecisive indeed.  Undecided 
Logged

If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is definitely not for you...
webmistress
Admin
CDI Member
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4561



WWW
« Reply #17 on: February 09, 2009, 01:08:38 PM »

We had a pear that was a Daussi and I wondered about the depth. I tried it on when I was in NY and it was gorgeous. I forgot all about the depth. Do you guys remember? The double halo pear that was light yellow?

If you think the tint might bother your GF, you might want to go with the white gold split shank. I do like the character of the .42 though since it has an antique like appearance.

And I have to say that I like the fact these rings show up larger. They look far more expensive than the price tag. Diamondhunter, you can exchange, too. We have a return policy and David wants you to be happy.
Logged

Webmistress for http://diamondsbylauren.com
DBL Web Designer, CDI Administrator

  Dare to be different. See colored diamond rings.
Mrs Mitchell
Member Moderator
Hero Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7563


« Reply #18 on: February 09, 2009, 02:25:08 PM »

Hey, that's a good point WM! The return policy. If your GF likes the overall look but doesn't care for a slight tint, you can swap. Or, if you're sentimental about her wearing the ring you propose with (I would be, I think) is there any way you can use a simple silver ring as a placeholder (so she can wear it as a rhr, maybe) and then have her pick which of your choices she'd like best?

If all else fails, buy 'em both and send one back!

When are you planning to propose, btw? Wish you luck with it, but I'm sure you won't need any!

Jen
Logged

Customer Service Associate
jennifer@diamondsbylauren.com
DiamondHunter
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 220



« Reply #19 on: February 10, 2009, 10:25:49 AM »

Funny you shd mention 'antique', WM 'cuz I have actually thought of passing this off as a heirloom antique, lol. But I'm hopelessly bad at lying and I'm pretty sure she'll love whatever I get for her 'cuz the proposal is worth far more than the ring.

Jen, if I could buy both, I would have gone straight for the 0.67ct GIA G/VS1 Halo.  laugh

As of now, I am looking around to see what else I can get for the same pricetag. With the 2837 I reckon at least two thirds of the costs went into the micropave platinum setting. I know I can go for a better quality center cushion but at the expense of the exquisite Daussi-inspired setting.

Another option could be to partner the 0.50ct E/SI (R2561) cushion with a simple micropave band. Does anyone have a simlarly styled cushion ring so I can picture how it might look?   
   
Logged

If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is definitely not for you...
Trinkette
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7208



« Reply #20 on: February 10, 2009, 11:11:12 AM »

DH, if you want an option to the halo style, and still want significant sparklies on the band, you might want to give this style a look.
http://rockdiamond.c...azzled-with-diamonds

It is different than so many of the delicate micropave rings we see nowadays... you may, or may not, prefer the look.  It is a bit more modern, maybe too much so for your GF's liking. dontknow

I saw the unset sapphire (for the record, it is quite lovely) and mounting in person during a visit to David's, and I LOVED both. (But, I admit, generally, I have a soft spot for a weightier looking band, so this is right up my alley). Anyway, I'm not sure if this type of ring is to your liking, or would fit your financial plan (DAVID...?), but, I thought I'd mention it as an option style.

Although the sapphire in the offered ring is larger in size than what we've been discussing, I THINK you could mount a modestly sized cushion, oval, round... I don't know, maybe with some work on the prongs you could even fix a marquise SIDEWAYS on top and you'd have an elegant, unusual ER. If I could make ONE adjustment to the ring, I'd ask if the prongs could be slenderized without impacting center-stone safety... the prongs are a little modern looking for my taste, but, that is just me (and it may not be prudent to alter them).

Anyway, in the Member Collection section of the forum Gallery, there is a photo of DJM's DW's brown RB ring. Again, the center diamond is larger and the band is a bit wider than the one I've suggested here, but, the overall look is similar.

Also, do we know generally what size ring your bride-to-be may need? I can't remember reading this info anywhere (sorry if I missed it)... Your intended's finger size could make a difference in the overall best design choice for her, especially if her hands are unusually petite or Rubenesque, for example.
Logged
Mrs Mitchell
Member Moderator
Hero Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7563


« Reply #21 on: February 10, 2009, 11:35:36 AM »

Oooh, I do like the sound of the micropave band. That would be really pretty.
Mind you, Trinkette has a great eye for design  - worth thinking about anything she suggets.
Jen
Logged

Customer Service Associate
jennifer@diamondsbylauren.com
Trinkette
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7208



« Reply #22 on: February 10, 2009, 11:59:49 AM »

Mrs. M., you make me blush!  a08
Logged
DiamondHunter
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 220



« Reply #23 on: February 11, 2009, 10:41:10 AM »

Trinkette, thanks for posting that link.  I have certainly considered having a slender micropave band which my GF will approve and a brighter center stone. I will check out some ovals. My GF's ring finger is a Size 6 btw.   Smiley
Logged

If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is definitely not for you...
Diamondsbylauren
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8063



WWW
« Reply #24 on: February 11, 2009, 01:49:13 PM »

Funny you shd mention 'antique', WM 'cuz I have actually thought of passing this off as a heirloom antique, lol. But I'm hopelessly bad at lying and I'm pretty sure she'll love whatever I get for her 'cuz the proposal is worth far more than the ring.

Jen, if I could buy both, I would have gone straight for the 0.67ct GIA G/VS1 Halo.  laugh

As of now, I am looking around to see what else I can get for the same pricetag. With the 2837 I reckon at least two thirds of the costs went into the micropave platinum setting. I know I can go for a better quality center cushion but at the expense of the exquisite Daussi-inspired setting.

Another option could be to partner the 0.50ct E/SI (R2561) cushion with a simple micropave band. Does anyone have a simlarly styled cushion ring so I can picture how it might look?   
   

Hi all!
We can make any ring that you see on the site to fit just about any diamond.......
The thing about the Daussi rings is that we buy them complete- and many times for prices that are really less than it would cost to buy the diamond, and them the ring.
Logged

David
Check out our YouTube Channel
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 14 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Subscribe to RSS Feed http://coloreddiamond.info/images/rss-icon.jpg