|
|
|
|
|
|
Snooper
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: February 27, 2007, 01:40:49 PM » |
|
Yes I like the way you think too! I noticed a lot of bands are on average 2.5-3mm, and that sometimes to me, seems a bit thick. At least for my short stumpy fingers anyway:)
I would love to see some 2mm bands with a lot of sparkle. When I clean my Rit band, it's sparkly, but it gets dirty so easily:( The 7 stone band I bought from DBL is fantabulous!!! but I can NO way wear a spacer between as my fingers can barely take the mm width as it is!
I'm 5'3", ave build, but I have the hands of a 10 year old (and I am not kidding), so I would loveeeeeeeeeeeeee for some THIN bands with bling!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
tea
Hero Member
    
Offline
Posts: 628

|
 |
« Reply #5 on: February 27, 2007, 02:44:56 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Snooper
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: February 27, 2007, 10:16:53 PM » |
|
I'd go w/ a half way too. And AZ? I'll keep my  on so I don't see scratches. I'm trying to let the bottom of my rings get a ding here and there--like a car's 1st ding.. Get it over with:)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Snooper
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #19 on: March 25, 2007, 05:43:36 PM » |
|
OH NICE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|