|
|
|
|
|
|
oldmancoyote
Hero Member
    
Offline
Posts: 3650

|
 |
« Reply #3 on: March 11, 2009, 05:50:59 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Namtan
Full Member
  
Offline
Posts: 180

|
 |
« Reply #11 on: March 12, 2009, 10:51:03 PM » |
|
some more questions What about 3 stones asscher. How much should side asschers weight? total weight around 1/2 ct ? I like the proportion of R1342 (the gorgeous 0.72 radiant pink ring). and how much will it be. under $3,000 still possible? Now I'm considering 3 choices 1) 0.76 J asscher with traps 2) three stone asschers 3) 0.76 J asscher studded in lucida setting. what do you guys think? I wear size 5 ring. Will number 3 choice look too small? so many questions ha  thanks in advance for your input. Namtan
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diamondsbylauren
Administrator
Hero Member
    
Offline
Posts: 8063

|
 |
« Reply #19 on: March 13, 2009, 11:56:11 AM » |
|
some more questions What about 3 stones asscher. How much should side asschers weight? total weight around 1/2 ct ? I like the proportion of R1342 (the gorgeous 0.72 radiant pink ring). and how much will it be. under $3,000 still possible? Now I'm considering 3 choices 1) 0.76 J asscher with traps 2) three stone asschers 3) 0.76 J asscher studded in lucida setting. what do you guys think? I wear size 5 ring. Will number 3 choice look too small? so many questions ha  thanks in advance for your input. Namtan Actually my favorite would be the three asschers- although that probably would bust the $3000 budget. I also like option 3..but that's a personal choice. The traps might look good- but we'd have to see. My concern wold not be that they would look like one stone but rather there would be a chance there would be too much prong for the stone size. Once I pick a pair of traps we'll have a better idea on that one......
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|